B
Cover image for I Am Solo
Shows·

I Am Solo

True to life dating show — where commentary is more fun to watch than the real thing

Metadata

CreatorsNam Gyu-hong
StarsDefconn, Lee Yi-kyung, Song Hae-na

The show in 3 sentences

Ever since watching Badly in Love, I’ve been addicted to Asian dating shows—or, more specifically, addicted to watching commentary videos and reading internet reactions to them. After shopping around a few options, the one I found most interesting was I Am Solo, where six men and six women—mostly ordinary people rather than aspiring influencers—come onto the show hoping to find a “mate.” They’re assigned fake names, each loosely associated with a certain personality type, and given about a week to date one another before deciding whether they want to leave as a real-life couple.

By June 2026, the show had reached Season 31, and things had been heating up because what started as a fairly normal love triangle gradually began to look, to many viewers, like several women collectively isolating and disparaging one contestant, Soon-ja. To my eyes, the behavior on camera was actually pretty subtle: some gossiping, some clique-forming, a few passive-aggressive remarks—nothing especially outrageous or overt compared with what you might see on an American reality show. I’m not sure how much the production team deliberately amplified the controversy, but spectacle or not, it worked. The season drew significantly more attention than most, and the live aftermath of the one-week dating experiment reportedly attracted around 400,000 concurrent viewers.

I didn’t care enough to watch the entire season in order. Instead, I found channels that analyzed the contestants’ behavior—their incentives, motives, social positioning, and relationship dynamics—which, I have to say, was much more interesting to me culturally and anthropologically than the actual dating. It also made me finally understand why my English curriculum used to distinguish between an “essay” and a “commentary,” and why the old GRE did something similar. The event itself is one thing; interpreting what everyone thinks everyone else is doing is an entirely different intellectual sport.

As much as I enjoyed watching the house of I Am Solo burn, I also came away feeling grateful to live in a relatively low-context society. If you want drama, the drama can certainly be spicy—but at least you usually know that you’re looking for it, where it’s coming from, and why everyone is mad. On I Am Solo, half the entertainment seems to come from decoding tiny shifts in tone, alliances, implied meanings, and things nobody quite says out loud.